Blogs
on January 8, 2025
He tried to assist the Court along with his genuine recollection, however it's fair to say that except aided by contemporaneous documents, his recollection was poor. I'm not being important of him, Crispin thinks his name 1 is better than Spin Answers however save for one matter in respect of which I feel he had a good recollection (contacting, with Ms Higgins' permission, a good friend to assist Ms Higgins) by far the surest information as to any interactions of Ms Higgins or others with him in 2019 comes not from his affidavit or unprompted recollection, but from the text messages which were positioned into evidence. We've a whole breakdown of brightness and why it matters in our OLED vs Mini-LED Tv guide. Okay. During the time that you have been at your desk, did you will have any additional interaction with Ms Higgins? On this research, the authors for the first time detected the spatial profile of thermally activated, quantized spin better waves in micron-sized rings with widths of only 400 nm. 471 Sixthly, and importantly, there may be the contradiction between this account and what he first told Ms Brown before there was any allegation of sexual assault. 468 Thirdly, and although less important, Mr Lehrmann did not mention being so conscientious that he determined to work on Question Time folders early on a Saturday morning when requested what he was doing by Ms Brown or when he was later requested to point out cause why he shouldn't be terminated for serious misconduct by the Minister.
Although I recognize that Ms Brown would have escalated the safety breach in the event Mr Lehrmann had accessed delicate work data, if Mr Lehrmann had, in reality, been working manually in recording essential info, one assumes there would have been ways of painting this data more favourably than coming again to the office for no purpose aside from to luxuriate while imbibing robust liquor. Moreover, it was a lie that had severe penalties, as a result of with information of the reality, he allowed his denial of getting alcohol in his workplace to go uncorrected throughout his criminal trial, and allowed submissions to be advanced to the jury that the account he had given to police was truthful and accurate (T202.1-3). I hasten to add that I have little question his senior counsel acted in accordance with applicable moral constraints on the criminal trial, and so it must observe he did not apprise his personal trial legal professionals as to the true place. After having had the advantage of hearing them in the witness field, I have little doubt the security guards had been conscientiously trying to do their jobs and the submissions vital of them, which smack of both hindsight distortion and Grundyism, ought to not be accepted.
Be the first person to like this.